Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 40(3): 281-286, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33743161

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a rare, life-threatening disease characterized by hepatic venous outflow obstruction. Liver transplantation (LT) is widely accepted as an effective therapeutic measure for irreversible liver failure due to BCS. There is debate on differences in the post LT course and complications in patients with BCS as compared to non-Budd-Chiari (NBC) patients. METHOD: In this retrospective study, data on all patients who received a liver transplant for BCS at the Shiraz Organ Transplantation Center between January 1996 and September 2017 were reviewed and compared to data of a control group who had received liver transplants over the same period but due to other causes (NBC). RESULTS: Out of 4225 patients who received liver transplants in the study period, 108 had BCS and an age- and gender-matched control group consisted of 108 NBC cases. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores were 19.1 ± 3 and 20 ± 3 for BCS and NBC groups, respectively (p = 0.33). One-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates in the BCS group were as follows: 82%, 78%, 76%, and 76% compared with the NBC rates of 83%, 83%, 83%, and 76%, respectively (p = 0.556). There was no difference between the two groups in complication rates after 6 months. In the later period, vascular thrombosis was more common in BCS. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-organ LT from deceased donors in patients with BCS had comparable outcomes with LT due to other causes of end-stage liver disease. In most instances, these patients should receive lifelong anticoagulation.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Budd-Chiari , Doença Hepática Terminal , Transplante de Fígado , Síndrome de Budd-Chiari/etiologia , Doença Hepática Terminal/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
2.
Arq Gastroenterol ; 56(3): 323-328, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31633733

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There has been little evidence to suggest that the IL-6 -174G>C and IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphisms are significantly associated with susceptibility to celiac disease. Thus, we performed the present meta-analysis to explore the potential association between these polymorphisms and celiac disease risk. METHODS: Eligible studies were searched in PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and CNKI database up to April 20, 2019. Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were calculated to assess the potential associations. Moreover, we performed the heterogeneity, sensitivity, and publication bias tests to clarify and validate the pooled results. RESULTS: Overall, nine case-control studies involving five studies with 737 cases and 1,338 control on IL-6 -174G>C polymorphism and four studies with 923 cases and 864 controls on IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphism were selected. The pooled ORs showed that the IL-6 -174G>C and IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphisms were not significantly associated with increased risk of celiac disease under all five genetic models. There was no publication bias. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis summarizing all of the available studies on the association of IL-6 -174G>C and IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphisms with celiac disease. Our results suggest that the IL-6 -174G>C and IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphisms may not be associated with increased risk of celiac disease. Moreover, large and well-designed studies are needed to fully describe the association of IL-6 -174G>C and IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphisms with celiac disease.


Assuntos
Doença Celíaca/genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Interleucina-10/genética , Interleucina-6/genética , Polimorfismo Genético , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Genótipo , Humanos , Metanálise como Assunto , Razão de Chances
3.
Arq. gastroenterol ; 56(3): 323-328, July-Sept. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1038720

RESUMO

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: There has been little evidence to suggest that the IL-6 -174G>C and IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphisms are significantly associated with susceptibility to celiac disease. Thus, we performed the present meta-analysis to explore the potential association between these polymorphisms and celiac disease risk. METHODS: Eligible studies were searched in PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and CNKI database up to April 20, 2019. Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were calculated to assess the potential associations. Moreover, we performed the heterogeneity, sensitivity, and publication bias tests to clarify and validate the pooled results. RESULTS: Overall, nine case-control studies involving five studies with 737 cases and 1,338 control on IL-6 -174G>C polymorphism and four studies with 923 cases and 864 controls on IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphism were selected. The pooled ORs showed that the IL-6 -174G>C and IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphisms were not significantly associated with increased risk of celiac disease under all five genetic models. There was no publication bias. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis summarizing all of the available studies on the association of IL-6 -174G>C and IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphisms with celiac disease. Our results suggest that the IL-6 -174G>C and IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphisms may not be associated with increased risk of celiac disease. Moreover, large and well-designed studies are needed to fully describe the association of IL-6 -174G>C and IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphisms with celiac disease.


RESUMO CONTEXTO: Há poucas evidências para sugerir que os IL-6 -174G>C e IL-10 -1082A>G polimorfismos são significativamente associados com susceptibilidade para doença celíaca. Assim, foi realizada a presente meta-análise para explorar a potencial associação entre estes polimorfismos com o risco de doença celíaca. MÉTODOS: Foram pesquisados estudos elegíveis no Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science e CNKI Database até abril de 2019. Razões de probabilidades com 95% de intervalo de confiança foram calculados para avaliar as potenciais associações. Além disso, observou-se a heterogeneidade, a sensibilidade e o viés de publicação para esclarecer e validar os resultados agrupados. RESULTADOS: No total, nove estudos caso-controle envolvendo cinco estudos com 737 casos e 1.338 controle em IL-6 -174G>C polimorfismo e quatro estudos com 923 casos e 864 controles em IL-10 -1082A>G polimorfismo foram selecionados. As razões de probabilidade mostraram que o IL-6 -174G>C e IL-10 -1082A>G polimorfismos não estavam significativamente associados com aumento risco de doença celíaca nos cinco modelos genéticos. Não foi detectado viés de publicação. CONCLUSÃO: Pelo nosso conhecimento esta é a primeira meta-análise resumindo todos estudos disponíveis para associação de IL-6 -174G>C e IL-10 -1082A>G polimorfismos com doença celíaca. Estes resultados sugerem que os IL-6 -174G>C e IL-10 -1082A>G polimorfismos podem não ser associados com aumento risco de doença celíaca. Além disso, maiores estudos e mais bem desenhados são necessários para descrever totalmente a associação de IL-6 -174G>C e IL-10 -1082A>G polimorfismos com doença celíaca.


Assuntos
Humanos , Polimorfismo Genético , Doença Celíaca/genética , Interleucina-6/genética , Interleucina-10/genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Razão de Chances , Metanálise como Assunto , Genótipo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...